|
Forums23
Topics54,526
Posts765,001
Members2,123
| |
Most Online249
Jun 24th, 2024
|
|
|
#731939 - 11/28/2003 07:18 PM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: Scream]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
miss_diddy
Mawias sex slave !
|
Mawias sex slave !
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
hants
|
Quote:
Scream said:
ok i'm not name droppin, but when i spoke to maddox he said he prefered cubase 5 as he knew his way around it totally as compared to cubase sx. So i assume it's changed a bit, but i wouldn't know as i've never really used either.
use logic that kicks ass!!
  yes you are so name dropping!! you could have just said well from what I have been told!!! 
|
|
|
|
#731942 - 12/03/2003 09:14 AM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: DIRTYRASCAL]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
miss_diddy
Mawias sex slave !
|
Mawias sex slave !
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
hants
|
Quote:
DIRTYRASCAL said:
Get on SX2 mate. Its sooooo much easier to use. If you know your way around vst 5 then you will figure it out !!!! Dont let the new graphics scare you !!
 we got it all, but how to use any of it!!! HMMMMMMMMMM WELL!!!! 
|
|
|
|
#731946 - 12/03/2003 08:52 PM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: James_dup1]
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 476
ReBirth
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 476
Glasgow
|
Quote:
James said:
on a side note, is there really no one here who uses Cakewalk Sonar ?
It's very underated isn't it ?
I've playd around with it quite a few times and I have to say, I like the interface, and I found it to be very stable 
|
|
|
|
#731947 - 12/03/2003 11:57 PM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: ReBirth]
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,468
James_dup1
|
ClubTheWorld Founder
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,468
London
|
Quote:
ReBirth said:
It's very underated isn't it ?
I've playd around with it quite a few times and I have to say, I like the interface, and I found it to be very stable
Well I confess I've only played around with it for 20 mins on a demo and found it a bit confusing as the screen is quite muddled (compared to SX) - but I was wondering why not many of my friends/people here use it as I see magazines market it as "America's favourite sequencer". On the face of it it just looks a little 'too' involved but I'm sure it and SX do as much as each other. I have settled on Cubase now though as it just 'feels' more natural to me.
|
|
|
|
#731952 - 12/04/2003 12:16 AM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: James_dup1]
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,873
Mr_Happy
MangaFish
|
MangaFish
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,873
Essex
|
Quote:
James said:
Who knows - may be I'll do a 'demo' CD of just the 'doodles' but I wouldnt want anyone stealing them to complete their own tune lol !
My problem is concentration and focus to get something finished - I can keep pissing about and tweaking it because I'm never happy - so much so that once I've finished the tweaked version sounds NOTHING like the original - which actually sounded 'ok' to being with - doh !
I'm thinking of getting on a proper course in London actually - so I learn can apply myself better. I also know hardly anything about mastering.
did start a thread about this a little while back.
|
|
|
|
#731957 - 12/04/2003 04:21 PM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: Scream]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
miss_diddy
Mawias sex slave !
|
Mawias sex slave !
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
hants
|
Quote:
Scream said:
fuck cubase in the ass and go with logic 
We have cubase, so we will go with that for now, unless you wanna give us logic 
|
|
|
|
#731959 - 12/04/2003 05:25 PM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: Scream]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
miss_diddy
Mawias sex slave !
|
Mawias sex slave !
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
hants
|
Quote:
Scream said:
logic 5.5
tends to be a bit more greedy on the cpu too.
on the what pu too??????????????
|
|
|
|
#731962 - 12/04/2003 08:24 PM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: Shenlong]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
miss_diddy
Mawias sex slave !
|
Mawias sex slave !
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,751
hants
|
Quote:
Shenlong said:
Shenlong Translation Service:
cpu = central processing unit
i.e the processor in your computer 
|
|
|
|
#731963 - 12/04/2003 09:43 PM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: Agent]
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 476
ReBirth
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 476
Glasgow
|
Quote:
Agent said:
Stick with cubase if you have a pc.
Agree with that. Macintosh was being a bitch and bought Logic and obviously discontinued support and release for PC......BRILLIANT move on their part !!
|
|
|
|
#731965 - 12/05/2003 03:54 PM
Re: cubase sx
[Re: ReBirth]
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,468
James_dup1
|
ClubTheWorld Founder
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,468
London
|
Quote:
ReBirth said:
Here's a tutorial I did a while ago mate.
http://www.serious-sounds.net/forums/ind...7fb3ebc676a5dc7
'appy reading 
Fooking hell - nice one mate - I'll have a read of that later - site looks superb ! Loads of very interesting reading, I have just registered.
You should perhaps get that linked in the Mastering & EQ'ing (8 tutorials) section as well ?
Thanks for the info !
ps. InvisionBoard is wicked init !
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
3
guests, and
0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Girl's are the Devil