Forums23
Topics54,526
Posts765,001
Members2,123
|
Most Online249 Jun 24th, 2024
|
|
|
#711675 - 11/08/2003 03:45 PM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: luu_luu]
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,873
Mr_Happy
MangaFish
|
MangaFish
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,873
Essex
|
|
|
|
#711676 - 11/08/2003 03:46 PM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: Capn_Jack]
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,873
Mr_Happy
MangaFish
|
MangaFish
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,873
Essex
|
Quote:
Capn_Jack said: Then it'll go back to the same old problem, Creamy posting anon making it difficult to tell who's got a real problem and who is joking.
creamys windups were pretty obvious to work out from the genuine posts
|
|
|
#711678 - 11/08/2003 04:15 PM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: Capn_Jack]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Dawn
"Likes grubby lads"
|
"Likes grubby lads"
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Leicestershire
|
Quote:
Capn_Jack said: Then it'll go back to the same old problem, Creamy posting anon making it difficult to tell who's got a real problem and who is joking.
Ban his ass that's what I say
|
|
|
#711679 - 11/08/2003 04:17 PM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: Dawn]
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,873
Mr_Happy
MangaFish
|
MangaFish
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,873
Essex
|
Quote:
Dawn said:
Quote:
Capn_Jack said: Then it'll go back to the same old problem, Creamy posting anon making it difficult to tell who's got a real problem and who is joking.
Ban his ass that's what I say
along with james
|
|
|
#711682 - 11/08/2003 04:29 PM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: Mr_Happy]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Dawn
"Likes grubby lads"
|
"Likes grubby lads"
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Leicestershire
|
Quote:
yppaH_rM said: - its too late to save your own arse dawn. if i go down your comming with me
How can I possibly give a reply to that statement
|
|
|
#711684 - 11/08/2003 04:54 PM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: Mr_Happy]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Dawn
"Likes grubby lads"
|
"Likes grubby lads"
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Leicestershire
|
Quote:
yppaH_rM said: hehe - i very nearly added this -> but i thought i'd save it for after i get you drunk at smile
is on you then
|
|
|
#711685 - 11/08/2003 08:20 PM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: Phil_r]
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,039
LittleMissLoud
|
ClubTheWorld DJ
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,039
Loudy Land! (Souf London)
|
Quote:
Phil_r said:
Quote:
Capn_Jack said: Then it'll go back to the same old problem, Creamy posting anon making it difficult to tell who's got a real problem and who is joking. Plus anyone can start a personal attack hidden by anonimity.
There is always... The Samaritans - Confidential emotional support 24 hours a day.
yeh well to be honest if he wants to be a **** and post "wind up shit" in a Serious forum", that shouldn't be felt by everyone else by the fact they can't post anon.
would creamy's time not be better spent "removing in appropriate" anon posts, than posting up his own anon shit?
"yes"
and yes, but I'm sure i can think of lots, and lots of good reasons why being able to post on here anon, rather than just talk to the samaritans, is a good thing.
In all fairness Phil, Creamy's posts are very obvious, and you have got to be thick if you were to confuse them with the real thing.
And it is not because of him that the anonymous feature was revoked - it was because people were threatening other members and generally shit-stirring, and useing the anonymous feature to hide behind, so they would not be caught out.
Those are the people you have to blame for not being able to post anonymously.
She who laughs last, laughs longest.
|
|
|
#711686 - 11/08/2003 11:54 PM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: LittleMissLoud]
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22,280
Maria
|
Likes it HARD !
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22,280
On your face.
|
Quote:
LittleMissLoud said:
In all fairness Phil, Creamy's posts are very obvious, and you have got to be thick if you were to confuse them with the real thing.
And it is not because of him that the anonymous feature was revoked - it was because people were threatening other members and generally shit-stirring, and useing the anonymous feature to hide behind, so they would not be caught out.
Those are the people you have to blame for not being able to post anonymously.
|
|
|
#711687 - 11/09/2003 07:56 AM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: Maria]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Dawn
"Likes grubby lads"
|
"Likes grubby lads"
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Leicestershire
|
Quote:
LittleMissLoud said:
In all fairness Phil, Creamy's posts are very obvious, and you have got to be thick if you were to confuse them with the real thing.
And it is not because of him that the anonymous feature was revoked - it was because people were threatening other members and generally shit-stirring, and useing the anonymous feature to hide behind, so they would not be caught out.
Those are the people you have to blame for not being able to post anonymously.
Like I said some great comedy value there ... but on a serious note ... why should a few people who act like they're back in the play ground, ruin somthing that could and was a very good feature for others.
I think the moderation on here is far far better than before, so would hopefully stop things getting out of hand in a malicious way.
It is only a Comment & Suggestion!
|
|
|
#711690 - 11/10/2003 05:41 AM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: benrostwood]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Dawn
"Likes grubby lads"
|
"Likes grubby lads"
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Leicestershire
|
Quote:
benrostwood said: i wasnt a member when the anon feature was available and havent been arsed to read any of these posts but i know that it wud just be wrong to have it as it wud be abused.
Its like turning off own number sending on ur mobile to prank call some1. U can really upset some1 from doing it.
So don't do it then.
Perhaps you should go read some of the serious non abuse problems then before you comment eh!
Not every one likes to air their dirty washing in public.
|
|
|
#711691 - 11/10/2003 05:42 AM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: CreamyC]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Dawn
"Likes grubby lads"
|
"Likes grubby lads"
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Leicestershire
|
Quote:
CreamyC said: it may be brought back providing the moderating is checked on a regular basis.
I think that is main thing needed if it was.
|
|
|
#711692 - 11/10/2003 06:12 AM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: Dawn]
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,162
benrostwood
DJ Benny Glass
|
DJ Benny Glass
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,162
Back at uni in Cardiff
|
Quote:
Dawn said:
Quote:
benrostwood said: i wasnt a member when the anon feature was available and havent been arsed to read any of these posts but i know that it wud just be wrong to have it as it wud be abused.
Its like turning off own number sending on ur mobile to prank call some1. U can really upset some1 from doing it.
So don't do it then.
Perhaps you should go read some of the serious non abuse problems then before you comment eh!
Not every one likes to air their dirty washing in public.
my post can mean either: i was the prank caller, i received the prank call or that i know some1 who has been one of the other 2 and told me about it.
All im saying is that its wrong
|
|
|
#711698 - 11/10/2003 04:20 PM
Re: Bring back anon
[Re: jon_m]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Dawn
"Likes grubby lads"
|
"Likes grubby lads"
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,073
Leicestershire
|
Quote:
jon_m said: how about a feature where posting anonymous is not possible unless you pm james (or a mod) so he can then temporarily set it up for you to make ur post? that way he can keep track of whos making the anonymous posts and ban anyone abusing them?
might aswell post it in random
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
3
guests, and
0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|